ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Machine Learning on the Pediatric Intensive Care (PIC) Database: PIC-Powered Prediction.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) applied to pediatric intensive care data could enable earlier risk stratification and more precise decision support, but limited shareable pediatric datasets have constrained progress. The Pediatric Intensive Care database (PIC) on PhysioNet provides a de-identified, bilingual electronic health record resource spanning 2010-2018. In this narrative review we synthesize ten PIC-based ML studies identified through forward citation tracking on the original PIC publication and PhysioNet dataset record in PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. For each study we abstracted the clinical question, cohort, label construction, feature engineering, model class, validation design, calibration reporting, and release of reproducibility artifacts. The reviewed studies addressed catheter-associated thrombosis, sepsis, in-hospital mortality, and organ-dysfunction phenotyping. We organize the synthesis around four substrate properties of PIC: irregular time series, constructed labels, single-center temporal drift, and bilingual identifier semantics. The review advances three claims. First, upstream design choices appear to drive performance at least as much as classifier selection across the studies reviewed. Second, within-site discrimination metrics are insufficient without calibration, decision-curve analysis, and deployment-realistic validation. Third, PIC should be viewed as the seed for a collaborative pediatric ICU data ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.