ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Extracellular Vesicles and Their Role in Osteogenesis.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as promising cell-free therapeutic agents for bone regeneration due to their ability to modulate osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and immune responses. This review summarizes the current knowledge on EV biology, including their classification, biogenesis, and molecular cargo, with a particular focus on their role in bone healing. EVs derived from mesenchymal stromal cells and other cell types promote osteoblast differentiation, inhibit osteoclast activity, enhance vascularization, and modulate inflammation through the transfer of bioactive proteins and non-coding RNAs. Recent advances in EV engineering, biomaterial-assisted delivery, and isolation techniques are discussed, together with their translational potential for the treatment of critical bone defects and avascular osteonecrosis. Although preclinical evidence is highly encouraging, clinical evidence remains limited, particularly in orthopedics, and clinical translation is challenged by EV heterogeneity, lack of dose standardization, limited understanding of biodistribution, scalable manufacturing, and regulatory requirements. Overall, EV-based therapies represent a promising future strategy for regenerative orthopedics and bone tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.