ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Rising Carbapenem MICs and Clinical Dose Optimization: Bridging Resistance Surveillance and Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Strategies.
Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rise in carbapenem resistance is well documented, but a less conspicuous trend has received far less attention: the gradual upward shift in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values among isolates that remain phenotypically "susceptible." We propose the term carbapenem floor for this phenomenon: an intermediate zone in which standard dosing regimens become progressively less reliable at achieving target exposure, yet which remains invisible to breakpoint-based surveillance; we present this as a hypothesis-generating framework consistent with existing pharmacokinetic and epidemiological evidence rather than as an empirically established trend, since no systematic longitudinal quantification of carbapenem MIC drift has yet been undertaken. Because carbapenems exhibit time-dependent killing and their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target has MIC as its denominator, even a shift within the susceptible range can substantially reduce target attainment; augmented renal clearance in critically ill patients deepens this erosion. This review integrates resistance surveillance evidence with PK/PD principles to evaluate prolonged infusion, loading doses, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), and empirical protocols derived from population pharmacokinetic models and local MIC distributions, examining for each the evidence and the practical constraints. We also consider the reverse relationship: failure to attain PK/PD targets appears to select for elevated MICs, suggesting that dosing practice may contribute to resistance selection and potentially influence resistance epidemiology, not only respond to it. Extending antibiogram reporting to include MIC distributions, and translating those data into dosing protocols through antimicrobial stewardship, is a feasible priority where TDM infrastructure is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.