ReviewBiomedicines2026
Interorgan Crosstalk in MASLD: A Narrative Review.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a systemic disorder shaped by interorgan crosstalk: dynamic, bidirectional communication through which the liver and endocrine organs, gut, adipose tissue, brain, kidney, skeletal muscle, bone, and heart exchange signals to coordinate metabolism, immunity, and tissue homeostasis. Across these axes, neural circuits, hormones, cytokines, adipokines, hepatokines, myokines, osteokines, bile acids, microbial metabolites, lipids, extracellular vesicles, and microRNAs integrate nutrient handling, insulin action, immunity, mitochondrial function, and tissue remodeling. Perturbation of these networks converts physiological homeostasis into self-reinforcing loops of substrate overflow, endocrine dysregulation, dysbiosis, inflammation, and fibrogenesis, while hepatic dysfunction propagates renal, neurocognitive, cardiometabolic, and musculoskeletal complications. This framework helps explain why individuals with comparable steatosis show divergent trajectories of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), fibrosis, extrahepatic disease, and treatment response. It also highlights tractable points of intervention, including restoration of adipose buffering, modulation of gut microbial and bile-acid signaling, correction of endocrine drivers, preservation of muscle and bone, and integrated cardio-kidney-liver risk reduction across different disease stages and clinical phenotypes. We argue that precision hepatology should move beyond isolated assessment of liver fat and fibrosis towards multidimensional phenotyping of dominant crosstalk mechanisms. Longitudinal multi-omic studies and trials incorporating outcomes across organs are now required to distinguish causal signals from disease correlates, define clinically actionable endotypes, and test whether targeting one node can restore durable metabolic and functional resilience throughout the interconnected MASLD network, while improving patient-centered outcomes across the disease course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.