ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Artificial Intelligence for Intracranial Aneurysm Detection, Rupture-Risk Prediction, and Prognosis Evaluation: Recent Advances and Clinical Integration.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intracranial aneurysm rupture is a major cause of hemorrhagic stroke and a significant contributor to human mortality. With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), a series of new approaches have been introduced to improve aneurysm detection, rupture assessment, risk prediction, and prognosis evaluation. This narrative review synthesizes the findings from 21 peer-reviewed studies identified through searches in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore, covering the period from June to September 2025. The reviewed studies examined the use of AI for aneurysm detection, rupture assessment and risk prediction, and prognosis evaluation based on clinical, morphological, radiomic, and hemodynamic data. The reviewed studies applied different AI approaches, including conventional ML algorithms, convolutional neural networks, transformer-based models, radiomics, and multimodal models. Several studies reported encouraging performance in aneurysm detection, segmentation, rupture assessment, and prognosis evaluation, while some approaches showed better performance compared with traditional clinical scoring systems. However, important limitations remain, including the frequent use of small or single-center datasets, limited external validation, and heterogeneity in imaging protocols and feature-extraction methods. AI is showing strong potential in supporting the management of intracranial aneurysms. However, further research is needed, particularly through multicenter and external validation, improved model explainability and robustness, and better integration of these systems into clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.