Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42793684›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Artificial Intelligence for Intracranial Aneurysm Detection, Rupture-Risk Prediction, and Prognosis Evaluation: Recent Advances and Clinical Integration.

Olti Qirici, Eugen Enesi, Kleona Binjaku, Anduel Kuqi, Indrit Enesi, Ana Ktona, Elinda Kajo Meçe, Arjan Durresi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olti QiriciFaculty of Natural Sciences, University of Tirana, 1000 Tirana, Albania.ORCID 0000-0003-1080-5403
Eugen EnesiService of Radiology, University Hospital Center Mother Theresa, 1001 Tirana, Albania.ORCID 0000-0002-5097-9574
Kleona BinjakuFaculty of Information Technology, Polytechnic University of Tirana, 1001 Tirana, Albania.ORCID 0009-0006-9019-2481
Anduel KuqiFaculty of Information Technology, Polytechnic University of Tirana, 1001 Tirana, Albania.ORCID 0000-0002-7141-0475
Indrit EnesiFaculty of Information Technology, Polytechnic University of Tirana, 1001 Tirana, Albania.ORCID 0000-0002-2695-2726
Ana KtonaFaculty of Natural Sciences, University of Tirana, 1000 Tirana, Albania.ORCID 0000-0002-6749-117X
Elinda Kajo MeçeFaculty of Information Technology, Polytechnic University of Tirana, 1001 Tirana, Albania.ORCID 0009-0002-7353-476X
Arjan DurresiLuddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5827-0877

Funding

National Program for Research and Development, Albania NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial aneurysm rupture is a major cause of hemorrhagic stroke and a significant contributor to human mortality. With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), a series of new approaches have been introduced to improve aneurysm detection, rupture assessment, risk prediction, and prognosis evaluation. This narrative review synthesizes the findings from 21 peer-reviewed studies identified through searches in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore, covering the period from June to September 2025. The reviewed studies examined the use of AI for aneurysm detection, rupture assessment and risk prediction, and prognosis evaluation based on clinical, morphological, radiomic, and hemodynamic data. The reviewed studies applied different AI approaches, including conventional ML algorithms, convolutional neural networks, transformer-based models, radiomics, and multimodal models. Several studies reported encouraging performance in aneurysm detection, segmentation, rupture assessment, and prognosis evaluation, while some approaches showed better performance compared with traditional clinical scoring systems. However, important limitations remain, including the frequent use of small or single-center datasets, limited external validation, and heterogeneity in imaging protocols and feature-extraction methods. AI is showing strong potential in supporting the management of intracranial aneurysms. However, further research is needed, particularly through multicenter and external validation, improved model explainability and robustness, and better integration of these systems into clinical workflows.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencehemodynamicsintracranial aneurysmprognosisradiomicsrupture risk

Identifiers

PMID42793684
PMCPMC13605257

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.