ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Phenolic Antioxidants in Food: A Comparative Review of Chromatographic, Spectroscopic, and Electrochemical Detection Methods.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The detection of phenolic antioxidants in food is essential for ensuring food safety. Chromatographic analysis, spectroscopic analysis, and electrochemical detection are three mainstream techniques widely applied for qualitative and quantitative analysis of antioxidants in complex matrices. However, existing reviews mostly focus on single techniques, lack systematic cross-platform comparisons. This paper reviews the classification of phenolic antioxidants, summarizes recent advances in each detection technique, and provides a horizontal comparison in terms of sensitivity, selectivity, analytical efficiency, cost, and applicable scenarios. Chromatography remains the gold standard for confirmatory analysis, spectroscopy is suitable for rapid screening, and electrochemistry shows unique potential for on-site real-time monitoring. Each technique has distinct advantages and limitations, and their integration represents a promising direction for comprehensive food safety monitoring. Future development trends, including intelligence, portability, and multi-technique integration, are also discussed to guide practical method selection for food-safety detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.