ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Sustainable Polymer Aerogels: Multiscale Design from Biomass and Thermoset Networks to AI-Guided Materials Discovery.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polymer aerogels have attracted increasing attention as lightweight porous materials for thermal insulation, separation, adsorption, remediation, and other environmental applications. Their low density and tunable surface chemistry also make them suitable for converting renewable, recycled, and waste-derived feedstocks into value-added materials. However, their overall sustainability remains difficult to assess because most studies focus on material properties, whereas solvent use, drying energy, processing yield, durability, regeneration, and end-of-life pathways are reported less consistently. This review examines sustainable polymer aerogels from the perspectives of cleaner production and waste valorization and focuses on two main features. First, a unified multiscale framework of structure, formation, and performance links network formation mechanisms, pore architecture, and macroscopic behavior across biomass-derived, thermoset, dynamic covalent, hybrid, and recycled polymer aerogels, which are compared in terms of feedstock origin, processing intensity, functional performance, durability, and circularity. Second, structure-property mapping is combined with sustainability-constrained, AI-guided design, with environmental descriptors treated as optimization objectives from the outset rather than as post hoc justifications. Particular attention is given to waste and secondary resources, including agricultural residues, textile waste, paper waste, recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate), and end-of-life tire fibers. The review also discusses how life-cycle assessment, service-based functional units, and minimum reporting standards can help assess whether sustainability claims are supported by measurable environmental benefits. Several recurring limitations emerge from the literature: sustainability is often discussed only qualitatively, processing data are insufficient to support robust life-cycle assessments, solvent exchange and drying remain major environmental hotspots, and circularity claims frequently conflate bio-based content, biodegradability, recyclability, and reusability. Finally, the review discusses how data-driven tools, including literature mining, machine learning, and multi-objective optimization, can support polymer-aerogel design when environmental descriptors are included from the beginning of materials development. The review also proposes a reporting and design roadmap for future work toward polymer aerogels that combine useful performance with lower resource intensity and credible end-of-life value retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.