Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42794473›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Olfactory-Cleft Biopsy in Alzheimer's Disease: An Emerging Neuroimmune Window into Preclinical Pathobiology.

James Chmiel, Aleksandra Kładna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James ChmielFaculty of Physical Culture and Health, Institute of Physical Culture Sciences, University of Szczecin, Al. Piastów 40B Block 6, 71-065 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0009-0005-5320-3658
Aleksandra KładnaDepartment of the History of Medicine and Medical Ethics, Pomeranian Medical University, Ul. Rybacka 1, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7871-3196

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfactory dysfunction is an early non-cognitive feature of Alzheimer's disease (AD), but smell impairment has traditionally been used mainly as a behavioral marker. This review examines the emerging use of the olfactory cleft as an accessible source of living neuronal, epithelial, progenitor, and immune cells for studying AD pathobiology. Histopathological and patient-derived culture studies have reported amyloid-β, tau, oxidative-stress, mitochondrial, biometal, and transcriptional abnormalities in olfactory tissue. More recent endoscopically guided brush sampling with single-cell profiling has identified activated memory CD8 T-cell states, inflammatory myeloid programs, and neuronal metabolic changes, including in cognitively unimpaired individuals with abnormal cerebrospinal-fluid amyloid biomarkers. These findings support olfactory-cleft sampling as a research platform for investigating early neural-immune changes, but current evidence is based on small, largely cross-sectional cohorts and does not establish disease specificity, causality, or prognostic utility. Longitudinal multicenter studies integrating olfactory-tissue profiling with established fluid, imaging, genetic, cognitive, and olfactory biomarkers are required before clinical translation.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseOlfactory MucosaAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsBiomarkersBiopsyHumansOlfaction DisordersAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseasebiomarker discoverybrush biopsyCD8 T cellsneuroimmune interfaceneuroinflammationolfactory cleftolfactory epitheliumolfactory sensory neuronspatient-derived cellular modelspreclinical Alzheimer’s diseasesingle-cell RNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID42794473
PMCPMC13607964

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.