ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Dietary Nucleotides as Potential Modulators of Inflammatory and Metabolic Pathways with Implications for Insulin Resistance.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dietary nucleotides and nucleic-acid-derived compounds are considered bioactive nutrients, but their metabolic relevance remains uncertain. This narrative review, supported by a structured literature search, evaluates intestinal handling and evidence on glucose and lipid metabolism, redox homeostasis, immune function, gut barrier regulation, and microbiota. Direct supplementation studies are distinguished from nucleoside/nucleobase evidence, dietary nucleic acids or purine-rich foods, and endogenous extracellular purinergic signaling. Preclinical studies suggest defined nucleotide preparations may modulate AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1)/protein kinase B (AKT)/forkhead box protein O1 (FOXO1) signaling, lipid accumulation, and mitochondrial/redox-related endpoints. In contrast, extracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) studies provide mechanistic context but do not show that oral supplementation modifies purinergic signaling in humans. Human intervention evidence is sparse and derived from older adults not selected for insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, or metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Reductions in homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) should be interpreted as changes in a surrogate estimate, not proof of therapeutic efficacy. The supplemental doses evaluated in available human intervention studies appear generally well-tolerated, whereas short-term high nucleotide intake can raise circulating uric acid. Dietary nucleotides therefore remain candidate, not established, metabolic or immune therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.