ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Advances in Regenerative Dentistry: From Biological Mechanisms to Clinical Translation.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in cell biology, biomaterials, and tissue engineering have expanded the possibilities of regenerative dentistry, promoting a shift from tissue replacement toward biologically driven strategies aimed at restoring tissue structure and function. This review examines advances reported between 2020 and 2025, considering their biological basis, current evidence, and level of clinical translation. Major developments include regenerative endodontics, periodontal regeneration, guided tissue and bone regeneration, platelet concentrates, bioactive biomaterials, dental stem cells and cell-free therapies, biomimetic enamel regeneration, and organoid and whole-tooth bioengineering. Although some approaches are already supported by human evidence and clinical application, others remain predominantly experimental. Importantly, favorable healing or tissue formation does not necessarily represent complete functional regeneration of the native tissue. Greater standardization, long-term clinical evidence, and reproducible therapeutic protocols are therefore needed to bridge the gap between experimental advances and predictable clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42795443What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.