ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Extracorporeal Free-Light-Chain Removal in Myeloma Cast Nephropathy: Plasma Exchange and Hemodialysis Strategies in the Era of Effective Antimyeloma Therapy.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renal impairment affects up to half of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, and roughly 2-4% require dialysis at presentation, most often because of light-chain cast nephropathy. In these patients, renal recovery is associated with the speed and magnitude of serum free light-chain (sFLC) reduction in observational cohorts, an association that mainly reflects the hematologic response to chemotherapy; the incremental benefit of removing circulating sFLCs by extracorporeal means remains uncertain, and this narrative review is organized around that question in the current era of effective antimyeloma therapy. Plasma exchange was tested in three small randomized trials before proteasome inhibitors were available, the largest finding no benefit, and two randomized trials of high-cutoff hemodialysis on a bortezomib backbone, MYRE and EuLITE, found no benefit for their primary renal endpoints, with more pulmonary infections in the high-cutoff arm of EuLITE. Medium-cutoff membranes, polymethylmethacrylate adsorptive dialyzers, and hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion have achieved substantial sFLC reduction with less albumin loss in small uncontrolled series, without any randomized comparison against conventional dialysis. Daratumumab-containing induction lowers sFLCs within days and may further narrow the residual rationale for enhanced clearance. Conventional high-flux hemodialysis combined with prompt antimyeloma therapy is therefore the evidence-based standard kidney-replacement modality when dialysis is indicated; the patient subsets in which a time-limited enhanced-removal strategy might still be tested are proposed as hypotheses for prospective trials, without validated thresholds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.