ArticleMicromachines2026
Comparative Performance of Electrode Models for Thickness-Shear AT-Cut Quartz Resonators.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we compare four electrode models, i.e., solid model, added mass model, thin-film model, and a combining model of thin-film with added mass, for a 76.8 MHz AT-cut quartz resonator. Relative to the high-fidelity solid electrode benchmark, the combining model accurately captures the thickness-shear mode but overestimates displacement confinement due to mass loading and boundary effects. The thin-film model fails to replicate practical device states by ignoring mechanical mass and stiffness. In contrast, the added mass model optimally balances fidelity and efficiency, matching the benchmark's frequency and resistance predictions with a 43% reduction in computation time. Parametric studies further indicate that cut angle deviations (33°~37°) alter equivalent shear stiffness, while electrode mass variations (mass coefficient 0.99~1.02) modify vibrational inertia. Both of them are critical for frequency tuning. Our findings clarify the scope and limitations of these strategies, guiding high-precision simulations and designs for high-frequency resonators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.