ArticleMicromachines2026
Topology-Driven Mechanical Tuning of FDM-Printed TPU Tubular Lattices with Auxetic Architectures.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Auxetic tubular lattices provide a potential structural platform for simultaneously tuning radial support, axial dimensional stability, and bending flexibility; however, the coupled effects of topology and geometric parameters on these mechanical responses remain insufficiently understood. In this study, a topology-driven design framework was established for fused deposition modeling (FDM)-printed thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) tubular lattices. Five auxetic topologies were designed by regulating curvature polarity and structural symmetry, while planar porosity and wall thickness were selected as geometric control parameters. Numerical simulations combined with experimental validation were employed to systematically evaluate axial bending stiffness, radial support force, Poisson's ratio, and stress distribution. The results demonstrate that geometric curvature promotes radial load transfer through an arch-like mechanism and contributes to stress redistribution, whereas structural symmetry strongly influences axial compliance and auxetic deformation. Planar porosity acts as the dominant macroscopic tuning parameter for overall mechanical performance, while wall thickness provides a secondary fine-tuning mechanism with greater sensitivity to local stress variation. Based on these findings, a hierarchical design strategy integrating topology, planar porosity, and wall thickness is proposed, providing a generalizable approach for tailoring the mechanical performance of FDM-printed elastomeric tubular lattices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.