ReviewNutrients2026
Plant-Based Diets in Adolescence: Cardiometabolic Benefits, Developmental Risks, and the Role of Fortification.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescence is a critical window in which dietary patterns stabilise while nutrient requirements remain high to support growth, bone accrual, and neurodevelopment. Plant-based diets are increasingly adopted by young people, yet paediatric evidence indicates that they should not be treated as a single exposure, because diet quality substantially modifies both benefits and risks. Healthy plant-based patterns-rich in whole grains, legumes, fruits, vegetables, nuts, and unsaturated fats-are associated with more favourable blood pressure, glycaemia, lipids, adiposity, and insulin sensitivity in adolescents, whereas patterns built on refined grains, sugar-rich foods, and ultra-processed plant products are associated with the opposite profile. Recent paediatric meta-analyses identify recurrent vulnerabilities for vitamin B12, iron, zinc, calcium, and vitamin D, alongside a leaner phenotype that includes lower bone mineral content and, in vegans, shorter stature. The commercial food environment is a further determinant: audits of plant-based meat alternatives show that most are ultra-processed, that salt frequently exceeds national targets, and that only a minority are fortified. Much adolescent-specific evidence remains low-certainty and cross-sectional. The relevant question is therefore not whether plant-based diets are beneficial or harmful in adolescence, but under which conditions they improve cardiometabolic health without compromising growth, bone accrual, or micronutrient sufficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42797002What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.