ReviewNutrients2026
Dietary Approaches in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated, non-IgE-mediated food allergy and a leading cause of dysphagia and food impaction in adults, with rising prevalence worldwide. Diagnosis requires ≥15 eosinophils per high-power field on esophageal biopsy after exclusion of other causes of gastrointestinal eosinophilia. Food allergens, principally milk, wheat, eggs, legumes and seafood, drive the inflammatory process, and treatment options include proton pump inhibitors, topical corticosteroids, biologic agents and endoscopic dilation for stricturing disease. Among these, dietary therapy is the only approach that removes the causative trigger rather than suppressing the inflammatory response, making drug-free, sustained remission achievable. Elemental diets achieve the highest histological remission rates but are poorly tolerated in practice; empiric elimination following a step-up strategy, starting with one or two foods and escalating in the absence of response, is more practical for most adults. Conventional allergy testing cannot reliably identify food triggers in EoE and is not recommended for this purpose. Reintroduction of the trigger food leads to relapse, making long-term adherence essential, and not all patients are suitable candidates: repeated endoscopy, dietary restriction, quality of life impact and the risk of avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) are barriers that must be weighed before recommending this approach. This review summarizes the available dietary approaches in adult and adolescent EoE, covering empiric elimination strategies and their efficacy, allergy test-directed diets, patient selection, the role of diet alongside other treatments, and nutritional adequacy and adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.