ReviewPharmaceutics2026
Delivering Degradation: Nanomedicine and Programmable Proximity Platforms for Targeted Protein Degradation.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeted protein degradation (TPD) represents a whole new paradigm in cell-level therapeutic design, with its ability to remove target proteins, normally through the endogenous proteasomal, lysosomal, or autophagic systems, rather than the traditional occupancy-driven inhibition approach. But the clinical efficacy of degraders is becoming more restricted based on delivery rather than efficacy only. Many proteolysis-targeting chimeras and new proximity-inducing systems have low solubility, are impermeable, are pharmacodynamically complicated, lack tissue selectivity, and cannot fully access the intracellular space. Nanomedicine and PD platforms could provide strategies not only to overcome these challenges, but also to provide other advantages, including enhancing exposure to degraders, biodistribution, controlled release, and context-dependent activation. This critical review is an outline of all lipid, polymeric, inorganic, biomimetic, targeted, activatable, and self-assembling delivery systems for TPD. We assess compositional considerations, in vitro and in vivo evidence, challenges for translation, and clinical endpoints required to support delivery-enabled degradation. Trusted TPD therapeutics need to relate different aspects of their design, such as degrader chemistry, carrier structure, disease biology, and pharmacodynamic biomarkers, to one another. Further investigations are needed to establish intact delivery of the degrader to the target, target depletion in relevant tissues, prolonged pharmacodynamics, favorable safety, and compelling therapeutic benefit relative to free degraders or traditional inhibitors. Thus, it is important to view delivery not simply as an additional step during formulation but as a design principle necessary for the reliable clinical outcome of degradation medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42797272What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.