ReviewPharmaceutics2026
Do We Still Need Chemistry for Water-Soluble Prodrugs? What Biocatalysis Already Does, and What It Does Not.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poor aqueous solubility limits roughly 40% of marketed oral drugs and up to ~90% of development candidates. One established remedy is the prodrug strategy: the covalent attachment of a bioreversible promoiety that regenerates the parent drug in vivo. The same conjugation can move a molecule in either direction along the hydrophilic-lipophilic axis: lipophilization raises membrane and oil solubility for permeation-limited or topical uses, whereas hydrophilization raises aqueous solubility. This review addresses hydrophilization and asks whether enzymatic (biocatalytic) synthesis can replace conventional chemistry in building water-soluble prodrugs. We examine, class by class of hydrophilic promoiety (polyol and sugar esters, glycosides, amino acid esters, poly(ethylene glycol), and ionizable phosphates), the biocatalytic toolbox (lipases, acyltransferases, glycosidases, and glycosyltransferases), the molecular determinants of its selectivity, the pharmacokinetic consequences of hydrophilization, and the translation of these reactions to process, benchmarking each against the corresponding chemical route. A three-part test emerges: enzymes suffice, and frequently surpass chemistry, wherever an accessible hydroxyl or carboxyl must be functionalized regioselectively on a promoiety bearing no competing group and a moderate solubility gain is required. This is the regime of polyols, most sugars, and glycosides, with drug-conjugate aqueous-solubility increases of roughly 4-fold to 5500-fold; chemistry remains necessary for ionizable phosphates, amino acid esters, and PEG carriers. Two gaps limit translation: the field's central 'green' claim is asserted far more often than it is measured (E-factor, PMI, life-cycle assessment), and in vivo pharmacokinetic data for enzymatically synthesized hydrophilizing prodrugs remain almost absent. We provide a decision flowchart that assigns each bond of a synthesis to biocatalysis or to chemistry, and reporting guidelines for the seven quantities that make a published E-factor recoverable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.