ArticleToxics2026
Chemistry of Food Processing: Acrylamide in (Ultra-Processed) Food-A RASFF-Based Assessment.
Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chemical hazards generated during food production and processing represent a major food safety concern because of their toxic and carcinogenic potential. This study investigated the occurrence and distribution of acrylamide reported through the EU Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) alongside research data to evaluate temporal trends, food categories at risk, and the implications of current regulatory and mitigation measures. A total of 98 notifications were identified between 2009 and 2025, with a marked increase following the implementation of EU regulatory measures in 2017 and 2019. However, consistently high numbers of notifications were observed only during the final three years of the study period. Acrylamide was predominantly associated with thermally processed foods, particularly cereals and bakery products, and prepared dishes and snacks. The geographical distribution of notifications partially reflected established production and trade patterns, with Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Ukraine, and the Netherlands representing the most frequently reported countries of origin. Classification of the reported products according to the NOVA system, combined with RASFF risk decisions and notification classifications, revealed a marked concentration of high-risk notifications in ultra-processed foods. These products accounted for 85.7% of notifications classified as posing a serious risk and 77.3% of alert notifications, underscoring their disproportionate contribution to acrylamide-related food safety concerns. Overall, the findings demonstrate that, despite the implementation of regulatory measures and mitigation strategies, acrylamide remains a persistent challenge throughout the food chain, highlighting the need for continuous monitoring, enhanced analytical surveillance, and more effective mitigation approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.