ReviewVeterinary sciences2026
Prestorage Leukoreduction of Canine Blood Products: A Critically Appraised Topic.
Review in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood transfusion is a life-saving intervention in canine critical care, but the clinical value of prestorage leukoreduction remains uncertain. This Critically Appraised Topic addressed whether leukoreduced canine blood products, compared with corresponding non-leukoreduced products, improve product quality, reduce recipient inflammatory responses or transfusion reactions, and improve patient-centered outcomes. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CAB Abstracts were searched from inception to 10 March 2026 using a common search strategy. Twenty-eight comparative articles were retained for appraisal after exclusion of five reports that did not contain a direct leukoreduced-versus-non-leukoreduced comparison aligned with the structured question. Most of the available evidence concerns laboratory and storage outcomes. Leukoreduction modified selected biochemical, inflammatory, oxidative, and cellular markers, but the direction and consistency of the findings varied across outcomes and studies. Clinical studies did not demonstrate a consistent reduction in transfusion reactions or improvement in survival or recovery. Current evidence therefore supports leukoreduction primarily as a blood-product processing strategy; it is insufficient to establish a patient-centered benefit from routine universal leukoreduction in dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.