ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Maternal mHealth usability strengthened by trust, governance, and navigation.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maternal mobile health (mHealth) technologies have expanded rapidly, offering scalable tools to support education, reminders, symptom monitoring, and patient engagement across the perinatal continuum. Despite demonstrated improvements in usability and intermediate behavioral outcomes, persistent disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality highlight the limits of engagement-driven digital innovation. This Perspective advances the viewpoint that maternal mHealth effectiveness depends not only on user-centered design but on alignment with health system structures, governance practices, trust dynamics, healthcare navigation, and navigable care pathways. Drawing on behavioral science, implementation research, digital health governance scholarship, and maternal health equity literature, this paper examines (1) the promise and limits of maternal mHealth, (2) the gap between engagement and clinically meaningful impact, (3) trust as foundational infrastructure, (4) governance and transparency as structural determinants of legitimacy and sustainability, and (5) navigation as the operational bridge between digital activation and real-world maternal healthcare utilization. We propose reframing maternal mHealth as connective infrastructure rather than a feature-driven product model. Within this framework, healthcare navigation is conceptualized as a multidimensional construct comprising behavioral, technological, organizational, and relational dimensions that enable women to move effectively through fragmented healthcare systems. In this framework, usability and engagement remain essential but must be integrated with transparent governance, participatory processes, culturally responsive navigation, and system alignment to translate digital prompts into timely care utilization and equitable maternal health outcomes. Designing for both systems and users positions maternal mHealth as a structural intervention capable of advancing perinatal engagement and reducing disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.