Trial reportFrontiers in public health2026
Application of a chain management protocol in patients with chronic refractory wounds under the medical consortium model: a health-services intervention study.
Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/objective: Chronic refractory wounds represent a major public health challenge in China, characterized by fragmented and unstandardized services, insufficient continuity of care, and weak inter-institutional collaboration. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a medical consortium-based chain management protocol for improving health service quality, care continuity, and clinical outcomes in chronic wound management. Methods: This was a health services intervention study conducted at a tertiary hospital in Nanchang. From June 2024 to May 2025, 68 patients with chronic wounds were enrolled using convenience sampling and randomly allocated to intervention ( Results: Repeated-measures ANOVA showed a significant time-group interaction for Bates-Jensen scores ( Conclusion: A medical consortium-based chain management protocol effectively optimizes health service organization, strengthens interdisciplinary and inter-institutional collaboration, and improves the continuity, standardization, and efficiency of chronic wound care. This model shortens healing time, enhances patient satisfaction, and provides an implementable and scalable strategy for chronic wound management in the health service system. It offers important implications for public health practice and resource allocation in wound care management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.