ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
Lineage relationships in muscle stem cells: linking functional fate to molecular state.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Muscle stem cells (MuSCs) represent a subset of satellite cells (SCs) and constitute the stem cell compartment of the skeletal muscle tissue. MuSCs and SCs are quiescent under homeostatic conditions but activate upon injury to drive regeneration and repopulation of the stem cell pool. Heterogeneity has become a central question in MuSC biology, prompting efforts to define MuSC lineage progression through both classical and modern experimental approaches. However, the relationship between the resulting lineage progression models remains unclear. Classical lineage-tracing and transplantation studies uncovered functional heterogeneity and suggested a hierarchical organization. Next-generation sequencing and single-cell technologies later resolved molecular heterogeneity and suggested a dynamic model of continuous state transitions. These two models are often interpreted independently, and their interrelationship is often overlooked. In this review, we critically evaluate the current evidence on the functional and molecular heterogeneity of the MuSC compartment during the quiescence-to-activation transition, emphasizing lineage progression models and the contributions of the regenerative niche and return-to-quiescence mechanisms. We specifically address the link between functional fate and molecular state, proposing a lineage progression model in which these concepts are not mutually exclusive, but rather are intertwined depending on the level and specific transition. Recognizing how functional stemness and dynamic molecular state transitions are related should encourage future experimental designs that combine lineage tracing and transplantation with single-cell multi-omics to obtain a holistic view of MuSC function. This is necessary to develop a better understanding of MuSC deficits in disease and aging, and pave the way for the development of therapeutic strategies targeting functional fate and molecular state links comprehensively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.