Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42798728›Full record

ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2026

Do Stimulants Promote Arrhythmic Risk: Insights From a Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocyte Model.

Alia Arslanova, Samantha Wong, Sonia Franciosi, Glen F Tibbits, Maksymilian Prondzynski, Shubhayan Sanatani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alia ArslanovaCellular and Regenerative Medicine Centre BC Children's Hospital Research Institute Vancouver British Columbia Canada.
Samantha WongChildren's Heart Centre BC Children's Hospital Vancouver British Columbia Canada.
Sonia FranciosiChildren's Heart Centre BC Children's Hospital Vancouver British Columbia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4587-1120
Glen F TibbitsCellular and Regenerative Medicine Centre BC Children's Hospital Research Institute Vancouver British Columbia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2586-3115
Maksymilian ProndzynskiCellular and Regenerative Medicine Centre BC Children's Hospital Research Institute Vancouver British Columbia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6846-6435
Shubhayan SanataniChildren's Heart Centre BC Children's Hospital Vancouver British Columbia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9296-7400

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stimulant medications are widely prescribed for ADHD. Although generally considered safe, their use in patients with underlying cardiac conditions remains a concern due to potential arrhythmic risk. Objective: To evaluate the effects of commonly prescribed stimulants on key electrophysiological parameters associated with arrhythmia risk in chamber-specific human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs). Methods: Atrial and ventricular hiPSC-CMs were plated on a multielectrode array (MEA) platform and exposed to clinically relevant plasma concentrations of methylphenidate, dextroamphetamine, atomoxetine, caffeine, or the β-agonist isoproterenol. Extracellular field potentials were recorded over 48 h to assess acute and prolonged effects on conduction velocity (CV), beat rate (BR), and corrected field potential duration (FPDc). Results: CV was largely preserved across all stimulant conditions in both atrial and ventricular hiPSC-CMs, while isoproterenol produced a modest early increase. All stimulants transiently elevated BR during the first hour of exposure, followed by a progressive decline over time. Isoproterenol and caffeine induced robust and sustained increases in BR, confirming model responsiveness. FPDc was prolonged by all stimulant compounds, most prominently by atomoxetine, consistent with its known I Conclusion: At clinically relevant plasma concentrations, stimulants modulated automaticity and repolarization but had minimal impact on conduction in hiPSC-CMs. The preservation of CV suggests that these compounds are unlikely to alter myocardial conduction at therapeutic doses. The observed effects on BR and FPDc warrant further mechanistic studies to understand how these changes may contribute to arrhythmia risk in susceptible populations.

Indexed as

arrhythmiaattention deficit hyperactivity disorderelectrophysiologyhuman induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytesstimulants

Identifiers

PMID42798728
PMCPMC13612964

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.