Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42798746›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Exploratory evaluation of encapsulated kratom using multimodal quantitative sensory testing in dogs.

Elizabeth A Maxwell, April Hardison, Raiane A Moura, Manraj K Grewal, Erin L Miscioscia, Veronica Perez-Rodriguez, Fiona Hecker, Diego A Portela, Judith Bertran, Abhishek Gour and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elizabeth A MaxwellPain Innovations Research Lab, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
April HardisonPain Innovations Research Lab, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Raiane A MouraPain Innovations Research Lab, Department of Comparative, Diagnostic, and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Manraj K GrewalPain Innovations Research Lab, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Erin L MisciosciaPain Innovations Research Lab, Department of Comparative, Diagnostic, and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Veronica Perez-RodriguezPain Innovations Research Lab, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Fiona HeckerPain Innovations Research Lab, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Diego A PortelaPain Innovations Research Lab, Department of Comparative, Diagnostic, and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Judith BertranPain Innovations Research Lab, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Abhishek GourDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Christopher R McCurdyTranslational Drug Development Core, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Abhisheak SharmaTranslational Drug Development Core, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Funding

Opioid use disorders: UF Pharmacy medications discovery and developmentUH3DA048353 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MCCURDY, CHRISTOPHER R, MCMAHON, LANCE R. · 2021 to 2023
$4.5M
Kratom alkaloids: in vitro and in vivo pharmacological mechanismsR01DA047855 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MCCURDY, CHRISTOPHER R, MCMAHON, LANCE R. · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA047855NIDA NIH HHS UH3 DA048353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Kratom has experienced rapidly rising popularity in Western countries, particularly the United States where an estimated 10-20 million individuals use it for management of mental health conditions, performance enhancement, substance use substitution, and chronic pain conditions. Despite widespread anecdotal claims of analgesic benefits, robust preclinical data on kratom's efficacy remain limited, necessitating translational models to evaluate its potential. The objective of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of an encapsulated kratom extract compared to buprenorphine and placebo in healthy beagle dogs using quantitative sensory testing. Methods: Eight healthy female spayed beagle dogs were included in this blinded, randomized, three-phase, crossover design following IACUC approval. Each dog received the following three interventions across the study period: encapsulated kratom extract by mouth at a 1 mg/kg target oral mitragynine dose, an oral placebo, or buprenorphine 0.02 mg/kg intramuscular. Each dog underwent baseline quantitative sensory testing and then at 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h post-dosing. Three doses of kratom and placebo were administered prior to sensory testing. Sedation scores were also obtained at each time point. Quantitative sensory testing outcomes were analyzed separately by modality using trimmed replicate means, with changes from baseline calculated for each dog and time point. Modality-specific minimum detectable change thresholds, derived from baseline within-time point variability, were used to classify meaningful responses. Treatment effects were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models (treatment, time, and sedation score as fixed effects; dog as a random effect), supplemented by summaries of peak change, time to peak, responder proportions, and trapezoidal area under the curve for both threshold changes and meaningful response burden. Results: Across QST modalities, buprenorphine elicited the largest threshold increases, with group-average peaks exceeding modality-specific Discussion: These findings underscore the complex pharmacological profile of kratom, suggesting differential modulation of nociceptive pathways that warrants further investigation into its multiple alkaloids, active metabolites, and their specific contributions to the observed analgesic effect.

Indexed as

analgesiacanine (dog)Mitragyna speciosamitragyninenociceptive thresholdspreclinical canine modelsquantitative sensory testing (QST)

Identifiers

PMID42798746
PMCPMC13612990

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.