ReviewOncology reviews2026
Analysis of the heterogeneity of the immune microenvironment of bone metastases and new strategies of nanotechnology intervention.
Review in Oncology reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone metastases constitute one of the most severe complications in patients with advanced malignancies. Conventional treatment approaches face significant limitations: surgical intervention carries a high risk of recurrence; radiotherapy and chemotherapy often cause myelosuppression; and anti-resorptive agents provide only limited control over tumor progression. Although immunotherapy has achieved remarkable success in various solid tumors in recent years, its therapeutic impact on bone metastases remains limited. This limitation is largely attributed to the distinct immunosuppressive microenvironment within bone lesions, which is marked by (1) a substantial decline in both the quantity and functional activity of effector immune cells, coupled with an abnormal accumulation of immunosuppressive cell populations, and (2) the formation of a vicious cycle of "tumor growth-bone metabolic imbalance-immune suppression," driven by complex signaling interactions among osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and tumor cells. Recently, nanomaterials have emerged as promising therapeutic platforms due to their precise targeting and delivery capacity, inherent immune-stimulatory properties, and potential to restore bone homeostasis. Nonetheless, translating nanoplatforms into clinical practice for skeletal lesions remains a formidable challenge. This review highlights how specialized organic-inorganic hybrids and biomimetic nanoplatforms have achieved the most significant microenvironment remodeling and osteolytic inhibition within intraosseous murine models. Ultimately, we provide an actionable roadmap detailing how integrating multi-omics precision profiles and temporal programmable delivery can bridge the gap between preclinical nanomedicine and clinical oncological translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.