ReviewGlobal heart2026
Menopause Hormone Therapy in Women With Cardiovascular Risk Factors or Established Ischemic Heart Disease: A Joint FIGO and WHF Position Paper.
Review in Global heart, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extending women's health-span is a key challenge for the medical community. Although women live longer than men, they face a higher burden of chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and disabilities. Endogenous estrogens appear to benefit cardiovascular health, and their marked decline at menopause is associated with increased cardiovascular risk; conversely, poor cardiovascular health may hasten menopause onset. Systemic menopause hormone therapy (MHT) begun early-ideally soon after symptom onset and at most within 10 years of the final menstrual period-alleviates climacteric symptoms and is associated with long-term benefits. This joint position paper between the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) and the World Heart Federation (WHF) aims at supporting both gynecologists and cardiologists in providing a tailored and evidence-based counseling on systemic MHT use to women with increased CVD risk or established ischemic heart disease (IHD). Women with CVD risk factors require thorough risk stratification to tailor MHT type, dose, and route. For those at high thromboembolic risk, transdermal estrogen, with micronized progesterone or dydrogesterone when needed, is considered the safest regimen. Women with established IHD may receive systemic MHT for symptom relief, provided risks and benefits are carefully reviewed. Transdermal low-dose estrogen, alone or with micronized progesterone or dydrogesterone, is the best choice. All primary and secondary prevention measures, including statins, should be continued. Managing the most complex cases warrants the adoption of a multidisciplinary approach between cardiologists, gynecologists, internists and primary care providers to offer the best possible care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.