Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42799698›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026

ToxiCompass: an evidence-tracked benchmark for short-peptide toxicity screening and confidence-aware assay prioritization.

Qiule Yu, Zhixing Zhang, Weihua Li, Guixia Liu, Yun Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qiule YuShanghai Frontiers Science Center of Optogenetic Techniques for Cell Metabolism, Shanghai Key Laboratory of New Drug Design, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai 200237, China.
Zhixing ZhangShanghai Frontiers Science Center of Optogenetic Techniques for Cell Metabolism, Shanghai Key Laboratory of New Drug Design, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai 200237, China.
Weihua LiShanghai Frontiers Science Center of Optogenetic Techniques for Cell Metabolism, Shanghai Key Laboratory of New Drug Design, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai 200237, China.
Guixia LiuShanghai Frontiers Science Center of Optogenetic Techniques for Cell Metabolism, Shanghai Key Laboratory of New Drug Design, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai 200237, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9648-844X
Yun TangShanghai Frontiers Science Center of Optogenetic Techniques for Cell Metabolism, Shanghai Key Laboratory of New Drug Design, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai 200237, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2340-1109

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China U23A20530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binary peptide-toxicity predictors support early screening but do not indicate which assays should follow a toxin-like prediction. We present ToxiCompass, an evidence-tracked benchmark and two-stage protocol for short-peptide toxicity screening and assay-family prioritization. The benchmark contains 6114 peptides reconstructed from online database of biotoxins and reviewed Universal Protein Knowledgebase records, including curated toxin-positive peptides and length-matched operational comparators. Among 2866 Stage 2 candidate toxin-positive peptides, 2858 retained at least one observed-positive target/effect-family label after evidence review. Exact-sequence merging, provenance tracking, Many-against-Many sequence searching 2 clustering at 90% sequence identity (MMSeqs90) cluster-level splitting, and explicit evidence rules define the evaluation. Stage 1 assigns a toxin-like score relative to the operational-comparator population, whereas Stage 2 ranks 13 broad target/effect families to prioritize follow-up assays for toxin-positive peptides with retained evidence. On the primary MMSeqs90 cluster split, Stage 1 achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.9871 and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.9867, while Stage 2 achieved a Hit@3 of 0.8955. In a more conservative grouped-split sensitivity analysis, Stage 2 Hit@3 was 0.6506. Together, these results support ToxiCompass as a reproducible benchmark linking toxin-like peptide screening with evidence-aware prioritization of follow-up assay families.

Indexed as

PeptidesSoftwareBenchmarkingHumansPeptidesassay-family prioritizationconfidence-aware screeningevidence-tracked benchmarkpeptide toxicitytarget/effect-family rankingToxiCompass

Identifiers

PMID42799698
PMCPMC13615547

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.