Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42799849›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2027

Assessing Sensitivity to Antifungal Plant Compounds or Agrochemicals.

H M Suraj, André Fleissner, Jan A L van Kan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

H M SurajLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5936-1420
André FleissnerInstitute for Genetics, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Jan A L van KanLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. jan.vankan@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3563-1550

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botrytis cinerea, a major fungal pathogen of crops, has been extensively studied for its resistance to antifungal plant metabolites and agrochemicals. Evaluating the sensitivity of B. cinerea to these compounds is crucial for understanding its pathogenicity and for developing effective plant protection strategies. This study describes two methods for antifungal sensitivity assessment: the spot assay, which visualizes fungal growth on agar medium supplemented with antifungal compounds, and the resazurin assay, which quantifies fungal metabolic activity in liquid culture. Using saponins as antifungal compounds, we demonstrate the utility of these methods on B. cinerea. These methods provide simple, reliable, and reproducible protocols to assess the sensitivity of antifungal compounds on B. cinerea.

Indexed as

AgrochemicalsAntifungal AgentsBotrytisDrug Resistance, FungalMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOxazinesPlant DiseasesSaponinsXanthenesAgrochemicalsAntifungal AgentsOxazinesresazurinSaponinsXanthenesAntifungal sensitivity assaysFungal resistance mechanismsPlant-derived saponinsResazurin assaySpot assay

Identifiers

PMID42799849

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.