SynthesisPediatric research2026
Enteric infections and childhood stunting: a systematic review and meta-analysis across four pathogen domains.
Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnteric infections have been implicated in childhood growth faltering, but the relative contribution of major enteric pathogen domains to stunting remains unclear.
methodsMEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to July 2026 for observational studies evaluating laboratory-confirmed enteric infections and childhood stunting. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Pre-specified subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.
resultsNineteen studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, of which 14 independent studies contributed to the quantitative meta-analysis. Overall, enteric infections were associated with significantly increased odds of childhood stunting (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.33-2.82), although substantial between-study heterogeneity was observed (I² = 85.6%). Pathogen-specific subgroup analyses showed comparable associations across bacterial, viral, protozoal, helminthic, and non-specific parasitic infections, with no significant differences between pathogen domains. Meta-regression identified participant age and adjustment status as significant sources of between-study heterogeneity.
conclusionEnteric infections were associated with increased odds of childhood stunting, although the certainty of the evidence was very low. IMPACT: Enteric infections were associated with significantly increased odds of childhood stunting among children living in low- and middle-income countries. Associations were strongest among children younger than two years, highlighting the vulnerability of the first 1000 days of life. Although pooled effect estimates varied across pathogen domains, no statistically significant differences were observed between pathogen groups, suggesting that multiple enteric infections may contribute to impaired child growth through shared biological pathways. These findings support integrating infection prevention, sanitation, and nutritional interventions into child stunting reduction programs.
Identifiers
42800810What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.