ArticleArray (New York, N.Y.)2026
Multimodal transformers predict cancer therapy response from tumor mechanics.
Article in Array (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precise prediction of cancer therapy response remains challenging because conventional biomarkers capture molecular features but overlook the physical state of tumors. We developed a multimodal deep-learning framework integrating ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) images with quantitative stiffness measurements (elastic modulus, kPa) to predict treatment outcomes in preclinical murine tumors. Each image-stiffness pair is tokenized within a transformer that learns interactions between local elastographic texture and global rigidity. A lightweight convolutional encoder extracts image features, the modulus is embedded as a numeric token, and self-attention fuses both modalities for classification. Trained on 1578 baseline SWE images from five syngeneic tumor models, the model classified tumors as responders, stable, or non-responders. Across five random seeds, it achieved 92.4% ± 1.3% accuracy, macro-F1 0.92, and ROC-AUC 0.99 on a held-out test set, with well-calibrated probabilities. Matched-split ablations-image-only, stiffness-token-removed, stiffness-shuffled, late-fusion, and stiffness-only-showed that performance reflected genuine cross-modal learning rather than scalar stiffness alone; shuffling image-stiffness pairings significantly reduced accuracy (all corrected p < 0.01). Leave-one-tumor-model-out analysis demonstrated generalization to unseen tumor types, with 95.5% ± 1.5% accuracy (range 93.9-97.9%) across five held-out models. Lower baseline stiffness correlated with better response, supporting the hypothesis that mechanically normalized tumors respond more effectively. These preclinical proof-of-concept findings establish tumor mechanics as candidate predictive biomarkers and transformer-based multimodal learning as a scalable approach to biomechanically informed response prediction, while requiring validation in human cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.