ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
Redox regulation of telomerase and telomeres in cancer: a critical appraisal of exposure, causality and molecular directness.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telomerase reactivation and altered redox metabolism co-occur in most cancers, but the literature joining them is hard to read whole. We separate it into five propositions - redox control of telomerase, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT)-dependent control of redox metabolism, oxidative telomere damage, redox-associated alternative lengthening of telomeres, and therapeutic translation - and appraise each along four easily conflated axes: exposure, model, causal test and molecular directness. Much disagreement then reflects design heterogeneity rather than genuine conflict, and one common design is weaker than it appears: millimolar thiol given before a thiol-reactive electrophile cannot separate restored antioxidant capacity from chemical quenching of the compound. Causal strength and molecular directness vary independently. The best-supported redox findings - peroxide-driven Src/Ran-dependent TERT nuclear export, and glutathione depletion with repletion - rest on necessity and rescue but remain pathway-mediated, in transfected or non-cancer systems. The most direct chemistry is biochemical and telomeric: lesion identity and position govern shelterin binding, G-quadruplex folding, repair and telomerase extension, and one acute 8-oxoguanine event causes dysfunction without shortening. We identified no study causally linking a residue-resolved oxidative modification of endogenous TERT to altered assembly, localization or catalysis; imetelstat is the translational counterpart, its randomized efficacy established but redox engagement and telomere pharmacodynamics unmeasured. We set out the measurements that would close both gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42801356What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.