Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42801364›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2026

Anti-phage defense systems in bacteria: molecular mechanisms and their role in shaping phage therapy strategies.

Shahzar Khan, Nadia Ilyas, Aneela Nawaz, Humaira Nawaz, Muhammad Ismail Khan, Muhammad Talha Bhatti, Umaar Hussain, Samiullah Khan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shahzar KhanFaculty of Biological Sciences, Department of Microbiology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan.
Nadia IlyasFaculty of Biological Sciences, Department of Microbiology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan.
Aneela NawazFaculty of Biological Sciences, Department of Microbiology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan.
Humaira NawazFaculty of Biological Sciences, Department of Microbiology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan.
Muhammad Ismail KhanFaculty of Biological Sciences, Department of Microbiology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan.
Muhammad Talha BhattiFaculty of Biological Sciences, Department of Microbiology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan.
Umaar HussainFaculty of Biological Sciences, Department of Microbiology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan.
Samiullah KhanFaculty of Biological Sciences, Department of Microbiology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan. samikhan@qau.edu.pk.

Funding

Higher Education Commision, Pakistan No. 20-16428/NRPU/R&D/HEC/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria and phages are engaged in a persistent evolutionary struggle. To survive constant phage predation, bacteria have evolved a highly diverse and multi-layered immune arsenal that determines the success of therapeutic phage infection. Bacterial defenses include receptor blockade, DNA restriction systems, CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity, and secondary messenger signaling systems that induce effector-mediated cell death. Recent mechanistic advances have elucidated systems such as Thoeris (gcADPR-activated SIR2 effectors depleting NAD⁺), CBASS (cyclic nucleotide-activated effectors disrupting cell integrity), and toxin-antitoxin systems (e.g., ShosTA disrupting purine metabolism). These defenses directly impact phage therapy outcomes. However, phages have evolved sophisticated countermeasures, including RNA-based anti-CRISPRs and enolase hijacking, while engineered phages carrying synthetic anti-defense proteins are being developed to overcome bacterial immunity. The present review integrates defense system classification, phage counter-defense evolution, and their associations with phage therapy outcomes within a unified framework for phage selection and engineering. This review provides a scientific basis for defense-informed phage selection, rational phage engineering, and the design of future clinical trials against multidrug-resistant infections.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacteriophagesPhage TherapyCRISPR-Cas SystemsHost-Pathogen InteractionsAbortive infectionAnti-CRISPRAntiphage defenseCBASSCRISPR-CasDefense islandsPhage therapyRestriction-modificationThoerisToxin-antitoxin

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.