ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Disclosure of HIV Positive Status and Network Characteristics Among a Cohort of People Living with HIV in Western Kenya.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Disclosure of HIV serostatus is critical in managing the health and well-being of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA), yet the decision to disclose is shaped by complex interpersonal and contextual factors. The purpose of this study was to examine patterns of HIV status disclosure and social support, and to characterize disclosure networks among a cohort of PLWHA in Kenya. We conducted a cross-sectional egocentric social network analysis of 174 PLWHA and their network members to examine whether characteristics of participants (egos), their networks, and network members (alters) were associated with HIV serostatus disclosure. Generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) examined alter characteristics, social support, trust levels, and an interaction between trust and intimate partners in predicting disclosure. The model was also stratified by trust to assess differences between low and high trust. Overall, 163 (93.7%) participants disclosed their HIV status to at least one person in their network. In the multivariable analyses stratified by trust, in ego-alter dyads where trust is high, the odds of disclosure are higher (aOR 35.34, 95% CI [10.05-124.32]) if the alter is a partner and a child (aOR 3.60, 95% CI [1.31-9.87]). In addition, disclosure was significantly more likely with alters perceived to provide health-related support (aOR 16.43, 95% CI [8.17-33.03]) or emotional support (aOR 3.20, 95% CI [1.75-5.86]). In Kenya, where disclosure decisions intersect with social dynamics, understanding the characteristics of disclosure networks can inform public health interventions that strengthen supportive relationships and reduce barriers to disclosure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42801431What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.