ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Performance changes in automated lesion detection under federated learning with sequential institution addition.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFederated learning (FL) enables multiple institutions to collaboratively train machine learning models while keeping data local and has attracted attention in medical image processing, including computer-aided detection (CAD). In FL, performance is expected to improve through retraining as additional institutions participate. The purpose of this study was to investigate how CAD software performance changes as the number of participating institutions is sequentially increased within an FL framework.
methodsWe used two types of CAD software for cerebral aneurysm detection in magnetic resonance (MR) angiography images and brain metastasis detection in contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images. Datasets from different institutions or scanner vendors were treated as independent FL clients and incorporated sequentially. Training strategies included from-scratch training, fine-tuning (FT) of selected layers, and full fine-tuning (FFT) of all parameters. Performance was assessed using the competition performance metric on test sets from the initial institutions as well as from all participating institutions.
resultsFor both CAD software types, sequential institution addition combined with FT generally showed higher median performance changes than from-scratch training. FT showed performance comparable to that of FFT while requiring substantially fewer trainable parameters. Performance improvements generally accumulated with sequential institution addition, whereas simultaneous addition resulted in less consistent improvements.
conclusionsSequential institution addition under FL may improve CAD software performance when combined with appropriate FT strategies. FT that updates only a subset of layers may achieve performance changes comparable to those of FFT while requiring substantially fewer trainable parameters across different lesion detection tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42801436What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.