Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42801436›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026

Performance changes in automated lesion detection under federated learning with sequential institution addition.

Yukihiro Nomura, Shouhei Hanaoka, Aiki Yamada, Tomomi Takenaga, Takahiro Nakao, Toshiya Nakaguchi, Takeharu Yoshikawa, Osamu Abe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yukihiro NomuraCenter for Frontier Medical Engineering, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi-Cho, Inage-Ku, Chiba, 263-8522, Japan. ynomura@chiba-u.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6471-9936
Shouhei HanaokaDepartment of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Aiki YamadaDepartment of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomomi TakenagaDepartment of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro NakaoDepartment of Computational Diagnostic Radiology and Preventive Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiya NakaguchiCenter for Frontier Medical Engineering, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi-Cho, Inage-Ku, Chiba, 263-8522, Japan.
Takeharu YoshikawaDepartment of Computational Diagnostic Radiology and Preventive Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Osamu AbeDepartment of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology JPMJCR21M2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFederated learning (FL) enables multiple institutions to collaboratively train machine learning models while keeping data local and has attracted attention in medical image processing, including computer-aided detection (CAD). In FL, performance is expected to improve through retraining as additional institutions participate. The purpose of this study was to investigate how CAD software performance changes as the number of participating institutions is sequentially increased within an FL framework.

methodsWe used two types of CAD software for cerebral aneurysm detection in magnetic resonance (MR) angiography images and brain metastasis detection in contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images. Datasets from different institutions or scanner vendors were treated as independent FL clients and incorporated sequentially. Training strategies included from-scratch training, fine-tuning (FT) of selected layers, and full fine-tuning (FFT) of all parameters. Performance was assessed using the competition performance metric on test sets from the initial institutions as well as from all participating institutions.

resultsFor both CAD software types, sequential institution addition combined with FT generally showed higher median performance changes than from-scratch training. FT showed performance comparable to that of FFT while requiring substantially fewer trainable parameters. Performance improvements generally accumulated with sequential institution addition, whereas simultaneous addition resulted in less consistent improvements.

conclusionsSequential institution addition under FL may improve CAD software performance when combined with appropriate FT strategies. FT that updates only a subset of layers may achieve performance changes comparable to those of FFT while requiring substantially fewer trainable parameters across different lesion detection tasks.

Indexed as

Computer-aided detection (CAD)Federated learningFine-tuningMachine learningMulti-institutional learning

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.