Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42801601›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

Beyond Probiotics: Postbiotics for Healthy Aquaculture.

Michael Leonidas Chikindas, Delin Xu, Igor V Popov, Kayque Ordonho Carneiro, Nilufar Arashovna Elova, Gullola Amirovna Bekmurodova, Dildora Amindjanovna Amirsaidova, Astghik Pepoyan, Shakhlo Mirjamalovna Miralimova, Oleg V Mitrokhin and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Michael Leonidas ChikindasHealth Promoting Naturals, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7265-4562
Delin XuDepartment of Ecology, Institute of Hydrobiology, School of Life Science and Technology at Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Igor V PopovInstitute of Life Science, Don State Technical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9223-8731
Kayque Ordonho CarneiroProBacLab, Laboratório De Microbiologia de Alimentos, Departamento De Alimentos e Nutrição Experimental, Food Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade De São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nilufar Arashovna ElovaInstitute of Microbiology of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3740-3700
Gullola Amirovna BekmurodovaInstitute of Microbiology of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Dildora Amindjanovna AmirsaidovaInstitute of Microbiology of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Astghik PepoyanDepartment of Food Safety and Biotechnology, Armenian National Agrarian University, Yerevan, Armenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1935-5341
Shakhlo Mirjamalovna MiralimovaInstitute of Microbiology of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Oleg V MitrokhinDepartment of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Liubov S SichelStellar Biotics LLC, Rockleigh, New Jersey, USA.
John TaggBLIS Technologies Ltd., South Dunedin, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Svetoslav Dimitrov TodorovDepartment of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6377-3305

Funding

Agência USP de Cooperação 3Acadêmica Nacional e Internacional (AUCANI, USP International Cooperation Office) 1819/2023FAPESP 2023/05394-9National Natural Science Foundation of China 32271568São Paulo, SP, Brazil, and Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal UID/05937/2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With a growing global population and strict restrictions on traditional antibiotics, sustainable fish health management is crucial for aquaculture. While live probiotics are popular alternatives, their real-world effectiveness remains highly controversial. Variable effectiveness results from complex interactions with different fish species, differences in fish gastrointestinal anatomy, and variations in environmental parameters such as salinity, pH, and temperature. Furthermore, live probiotics pose risks of ecological disturbance and horizontal gene transfer of antimicrobial resistance. This critical review assesses these limitations and proposes postbiotics, preparations of inanimate microorganisms and their metabolites, as a more stable, controlled, and biosafe formulation. Postbiotics offer significant advantages during industrial aquafeed production and storage. However, their practical implementation is currently hindered by vague terminology and legislative gaps. To overcome these obstacles, this review introduces an innovative modular analytical model utilizing specific chemical biomarkers (such as short-chain fatty acids, bacteriocins, and lipoteichoic acids). Implementing these matrix-matched, multi-module quality control panels to verify molecular safety, identity, and efficacy is critical to standardizing next-generation "precision postbiotics" for sustainable aquaculture development.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceaquaculture, sustainable aquacultureaquafeedsbiosafetyfish health managementgut microbiota dysbiosispostbioticsprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID42801601
PMCPMC13616333

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.