ArticleCureus2026
Perceptions, Barriers, and Breakfast Consumption Habits Among University Students in the United Arab Emirates: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background University students often skip breakfast due to academic demands and lifestyle habits. However, evidence on breakfast consumption among university students in the United Arab Emirates remains limited, highlighting the need for locally relevant data. Aim This study aimed to investigate breakfast consumption patterns among medical and non-medical university students in the UAE, with a particular focus on eating habits, consumption frequency, dietary choices, perceived barriers, energy levels, and the relationship between breakfast consumption and body mass index (BMI). Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 405 medical and non-medical students aged 18 years and above from universities across the UAE during 2024-2025. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling through social media platforms and in-person invitations, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. Data were collected via a structured questionnaire after obtaining approval from the University of Sharjah Research Ethics Committee. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 29 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) and included descriptive statistics, Pearson's chi-square tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, Spearman's rank correlation, and multivariable binary logistic regression. Results Medical students were significantly more likely to skip breakfast than non-medical students (38.2% vs. 25.2%, p = 0.005), mainly due to limited time and busy morning schedules. Both groups showed similar patterns in breakfast consumption frequency. Moreover, students who ate breakfast frequently (six to seven days per week) reported higher energy levels compared to those who ate breakfast less often. In our sample, BMI showed no significant relationship with breakfast consumption. While students from different majors demonstrated similar levels of knowledge, those who regularly ate breakfast exhibited better knowledge and more positive attitudes toward it. Finally, the findings indicated that greater knowledge about breakfast was associated with a more positive attitude. Conclusions The findings showed that breakfast skipping was more common among medical students than non-medical students and that more frequent breakfast consumption was associated with higher self-reported energy levels. Breakfast consumption was not significantly associated with BMI in this sample. Regular breakfast consumption was also associated with higher knowledge and more positive attitudes toward breakfast. These findings highlight the importance of addressing barriers to breakfast consumption among university students, particularly limited time and busy morning schedules. University-based strategies addressing these practical barriers may be considered, although their effectiveness should be evaluated in future intervention studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.