ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Interlocking pentagons task and visuospatial deficit in parkinsonian syndrome: a quantitative approach.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesVisuo-spatial impairment is a common feature in parkinsonian disorders and differentiating idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) from atypical parkinsonian syndromes (APS), i.e. progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA), and corticobasal degeneration (CBD), remains a major clinical challenge. The Qualitative Scoring Pentagon Test (QSPT), derived from the MMSE pentagon-copying item, provides quantitative visuo-constructive assessment but has not been systematically evaluated as a differential marker in parkinsonism. Aim of the study was to assess the discriminative value of the QSPT total score and sub-items across parkinsonian syndromes, and to examine associations with neuropsychological tests, motor severity, and MRI morphometric indices.
methodsPatients with PD and APS were enrolled and underwent clinical and neuropsychological evaluations including MMSE, Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), Trail Making Test (TMT-A), and MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-Section III (MDS-UPDRS-III). A group of healthy controls (HC) were also enrolled performing MMSE. Pentagon drawings were scored quantitatively (QSPT). When available, MRI morphometric features were collected. Statistical analysis were performed to assess associations between QSPT, cognitive and clinical features, and to evaluate differences between patients and HC and across patients' groups.
resultsOne-hundred and forty patients (PD=91, PSP=23, MSA=17, CBD=9) and 92 HC were enrolled. QSPT differed significantly considering HC performances (12.7 ± 0.5) versus patients groups, and across groups (p<0.001), with PD scoring the highest (11.5 ± 2.1) and CBD the lowest score (7.7 ± 4.4). PD differed from PSP (p<0.001), CBD (p<0.001) and MSA (p=0.040). Rotation and number-of-angles sub-items were the most discriminating features. QSPT significantly correlated with MMSE, FAB, TMT-A, and MRPI (all p<0.01). Multivariate models demonstrated that QSPT was independently associated with APS (OR=0.620, 95%CI 0.469-0.820, p<0.001). A QSPT score ≤ 8 points discriminated PD from APS with an AUC of 0.764 and a specificity of 92.3%, and ≤ 11 points discriminated synucleinopathies from tauopathies with a higher AUC (0.804).
conclusionThis study demonstrates that quantitative scoring of the MMSE pentagon-copying item could differentiate PD from APS. The presence of association between QSPT and MRI brainstem morphometry could also reflect a structural association, specifically identifying tauopathies. QSPT could be a simple and supportive clinical tool, embedded within the MMSE that could differentiates patients from HC and PD from APS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.