ReviewJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Fresh versus frozen-thawed testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe optimal use of fresh versus frozen-thawed testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) remains controversial. Although cryopreservation facilitates asynchronous ICSI cycles, concerns persist regarding its potential adverse effects on sperm quality and reproductive outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare ICSI outcomes using fresh and frozen-thawed testicular sperm in men with NOA.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed Central, Web of Science, and Scopus was performed for studies published between January 1995 and May 2026. Comparative studies evaluating ICSI outcomes using fresh versus frozen-thawed surgically retrieved testicular sperm in NOA patients were included. Outcomes assessed were fertilization rate (FR), cleavage rate (CR), good embryo rate, implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and live birth rate (LBR). Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models according to heterogeneity.
resultsThirty-six studies comprising 5086 ICSI cycles were included. Fresh testicular sperm was associated with significantly higher FR (RR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.14; p = 0.0069) and LBR (RR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.23; p = 0.0067) compared with frozen-thawed sperm. No significant differences were observed in CR (RR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.98-1.03), good embryo rate (RR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.99-1.15), IR (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.81-1.23), or CPR (RR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.00-1.21; p = 0.054). No significant publication bias was detected.
conclusionIn men with NOA undergoing ICSI, the use of fresh testicular sperm is associated with improved fertilization and live birth rates compared with frozen-thawed sperm. Nevertheless, embryo development, implantation, and clinical pregnancy outcomes appear comparable between the two approaches. These findings support the preferential use of fresh sperm when feasible, while confirming that cryopreserved sperm remains an effective alternative when fresh sperm utilization is not possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42804074What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.