ArticleNature communications2026
Diagnostic yield of cancer predisposition in a nationwide prospective childhood acute leukemia cohort.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The utility of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for detecting childhood leukemia predisposition remains unclear. We perform a nationwide, prospective, population-based study of 181 children with acute leukemia to assess diagnostic yield and clinical utility of a uniformly applied three-pronged strategy, including systematic phenotyping, germline WGS-based 189-gene panel and tumor sequencing of positive cases. Trio-WGS is performed in 11 high-suspicion families. Nine patients have pathogenic germline alterations: six (3.3%) with leukemia predisposition syndromes (TP53, CEBPA, DNMT3A, trisomy 21) and three (1.6%) with solid tumor predisposition syndromes (MSH6, PALB2, SDHA). Trio-WGS identifies one likely-pathogenic de novo DNMT3A variant. Six of nine diagnoses are previously unrecognized. Findings lead to tailored surveillance in 8/9 patients and treatment modifications in 4/9. Here, we show that this strategy gives a modest diagnostic yield. Nevertheless, the actionability of the findings supports its feasibility and validity in practice. Whether to restrict analysis to leukemia-relevant genes or broaden the panel should reflect local resources and counseling capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.