ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2026
Individual income and blood pressure control after antihypertensive treatment initiation accounting for regional variation: a Japanese nationwide study.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence on how individual-level socioeconomic status and regional disparities jointly influence BP control after treatment initiation remains scarce. We assessed the association between income and uncontrolled BP after antihypertensive treatment initiation and examined regional variation in Japan. We conducted a cohort study using health checkup data from the Japan Health Insurance Association (2015-2022). Participants were adults aged 40-74 years who had initiated antihypertensive treatment. Income was categorized into sex-specific quintiles based on standard monthly remuneration. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for uncontrolled BP (systolic/diastolic BP ≥ 130/ ≥ 80 mmHg). We included 381 116 females and 933 876 males (mean age, 55 years). Uncontrolled BP was observed in 68.4% of females and 75.3% of males. After adjustment for covariates, the lowest income category had higher odds of uncontrolled BP than the highest category (female, OR [95% CI], 1.48 [1.45-1.51]; male, OR [95% CI], 1.26 [1.24-1.28]). This association was attenuated after adjustment for pretreatment systolic BP. Prefecture difference contributed more to model fit than income category, as evidenced by larger Akaike information criterion (AIC) increases upon removal from the fully adjusted model (ΔAIC: 551 vs 255 in females, 1433 vs. 293 in males). The income effect on uncontrolled BP remained even within each prefecture, with low-to-moderate between-prefecture heterogeneity (I² ≤ 47.7%). Lower income was associated with uncontrolled BP. This association was attenuated after adjustment for pretreatment BP, suggesting that delayed detection or treatment initiation partly explains this disparity. Meanwhile, geographic variation across prefectures remained substantial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42806021What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.