Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42806166›Full record

ReviewNature cardiovascular research2026

Therapeutic upregulation of gene expression in inherited cardiomyopathies from current approaches to future directions.

Rosemary B Kirk, Celine F Santiago, Hugh Watkins, Christopher N Toepfer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature cardiovascular research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rosemary B KirkDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6205-7000
Celine F SantiagoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1549-3667
Hugh WatkinsDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5287-9016
Christopher N ToepferDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. christopher.toepfer@cardiov.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4671-2030

Funding

British Heart Foundation (BHF) BBC/F/21/220106Rhodes Scholarships NAWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 222567/Z/21/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A substantial proportion of inherited cardiomyopathy cases are driven by mechanisms of haploinsufficiency, where a loss-of-function variant in one allele leads to insufficient protein expression, resulting in loss of normal cardiac function. Current therapies treat symptoms or mitigate risk of complications and do not prevent disease onset or progression. Recently, substantial advances have been made in gene therapies for cardiomyopathies in both preclinical and clinical settings, particularly using viral delivery of whole genes and gene-editing approaches. Alongside these is an emerging area of therapies that aim to upregulate endogenous gene expression. This encompasses a broad array of strategies that may act by removing gene repression or directly enhancing expression, can enhance transcription or translation and may use a variety of modalities such as gene editing or oligonucleotides. Here, we review the mechanisms and current uses of gene upregulation strategies and critically evaluate their advantages and limitations as therapies for inherited cardiomyopathies.

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.