ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacology2026
Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Characterize the Disposition of Topiramate in Children with and without Obesity.
Article in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Topiramate (TPM) is used to treat seizures in adults and children ≥2 years. In children, TPM dosing is body weight based. It is unknown whether children with obesity may benefit from an alternative dosing strategy. We developed a novel physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for TPM that accounts for age- and obesity-related changes in disposition. The model was first developed and evaluated in adults before scaling to children then finally evaluated using opportunistic pharmacokinetic data from two multicenter studies where children with and without obesity ages 2-18 years received TPM per standard of care. Simulations were performed to characterize pharmacokinetic parameters and assess the current labeled dosing regimen in a virtual population of children with obesity (≥2 years). The adult PBPK model performed well when evaluated with observed literature data, resulting in an average fold error of 0.989 across the dosing range of 25-1200 mg. The pediatric data used in model evaluation included 43 children (86% with obesity; median [range], 8 [2-18] years); 71% of 134 observed concentrations fell within the 90% prediction interval for the PBPK model. PBPK based dosing simulations revealed comparable exposure (<20% difference) in children with and without obesity receiving the Topamax product label weight-tiered dose for monotherapy (weight tiered for 2 to <10 years and fixed dosing for 10 to ≤18 years) or weight-based adjunctive therapy. Comparable trough concentrations between children with and without obesity suggest the current dosing recommendations, including monotherapy and adjunctive therapy, are appropriate for children with obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.