Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42807325›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Compliance of large language model generated meal plans with polish dietary recommendations: a real-world evaluation under average user conditions-3(LM)Diet study.

Hubert Dobrowolski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hubert DobrowolskiSchool of Medical & Health Sciences, VIZJA University, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Diet is one of the key factors influencing health. Adherence to the principles of a healthy diet determines whether many diseases occur or are prevented. Numerous guidelines and recommendations have been issued to facilitate the adoption of healthy eating practices. However, putting them into practice can be problematic. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to large language models (LLMs). A growing number of reports also point to the risks arising from the uncritical adoption by the general public of health recommendations generated by LLMs. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether meal plans generated by LLMs comply with Polish healthy eating recommendations under real-world average-user conditions. Materials and methods: The three widely used LLMs - ChatGPT, Gemini and Copilot - were used to generate diets. Each model generated 35 days of meal plans across three specified energy levels: 2,000 kcal, 2,500 kcal and 3,000 kcal (in total, each model generated 105 days of meal plans). The menus were assessed for compliance with the recommendations based on the average number of guidelines met each day and the total number of guidelines met. Results: Copilot achieved the highest overall compliance score (median 7/9 recommendations per day), significantly outperforming ChatGPT (median 6/9; Conclusion: Diets generated by LLMs demonstrated moderate compliance with Polish dietary recommendations, although important shortcomings remained. While AI-generated meal plans may encourage healthier dietary patterns in some areas, they cannot yet be considered fully consistent with national dietary guidance. LLM-generated meal plans should be interpreted with caution and should not replace professional dietary counseling.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyGuideline AdherenceLarge Language ModelsMealsHumansNutrition PolicyPolandartificial intelligencediets analysishealthy eatinglarge language modelsnutritional recommendations

Identifiers

PMID42807325
PMCPMC13616943

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.