ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Artificial intelligence-based integration of imaging, exposome, and multi-omics data for immune-related biomarker discovery and precision prevention in breast cancer.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer management still depends on early detection, risk assessment, and individualized treatment. Imaging is used throughout screening, diagnosis, treatment evaluation, and follow-up. For this reason, artificial intelligence (AI) has become an active area in breast cancer imaging, especially in mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and radiomics. These methods may help describe tumor phenotype, estimate clinical risk, and predict treatment response. In daily practice, however, similar imaging findings do not always mean the same biology. Patients with similar images may have different molecular features, immune status, exposure histories, and treatment outcomes. Imaging models alone are therefore not enough to explain the heterogeneity of breast cancer. Environmental and lifestyle exposures, metabolic status, and immune regulation may also influence tumor development and prognosis. This review discusses imaging AI as a practical starting point for biomarker discovery in breast cancer. It also considers how exposome and multi-omics data may improve the biological interpretation of imaging features, and how immune dysregulation may connect external exposure, molecular change, and imaging phenotype. Current barriers include fragmented data, limited external validation, weak interpretability, fairness concerns, and difficulty in clinical implementation. Future work should focus less on building larger models alone, and more on developing transparent and validated tools that clinicians can use for risk stratification, biopsy planning, treatment-response prediction, and precision prevention. This highlights the need to integrate imaging features with multi-omics data to better interpret tumor biology and immune status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.