ArticleJournal of inflammation research2026
Interpretable Machine Learning Models Based on Blood Cell-Derived Inflammatory Indices for Identifying Colorectal Neoplasia: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Noninvasive approaches for the risk assessment of colorectal neoplasia remain limited, particularly in terms of interpretability and clinical applicability. This study aimed to develop and validate interpretable machine learning models using blood cell-derived inflammatory indices to identify colorectal adenoma (CRA) and colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included 1301 participants from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University between January 2017 and April 2022, comprising 487 healthy controls (HC), 327 patients with CRA, and 487 patients with CRC. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was performed to evaluate the associations between inflammatory indices and colorectal neoplasia. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and the Boruta algorithm were used for feature selection. Five machine learning algorithms were applied and compared: logistic regression, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGB). Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was applied to enhance interpretability. Results: Eight blood cell-derived inflammatory indices differed significantly across groups and showed stage-related alterations. RCS analysis revealed dose-response relationships between inflammatory indices and colorectal neoplasia. Among the five algorithms, XGB achieved the best performance in the validation cohort, with areas under the curve of 0.928 (95% CI, 0.900-0.957) for CRC and 0.829 (95% CI, 0.777-0.880) for CRA. The models also showed good calibration and favorable clinical net benefit. SHAP analysis identified the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as an important shared predictor, whereas the platelet-to-neutrophil ratio (PNR) and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) contributed more prominently to the prediction of CRC and CRA, respectively. Conclusion: XGB models incorporating blood cell-derived inflammatory indices demonstrated promising discriminatory ability and interpretability, and may serve as a noninvasive adjunct for colorectal neoplasia risk stratification pending further validation in prospective and external cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.