ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Next-Generation Sequencing Identifies Key Targetable Mutations in the Treatment of Appendiceal Neoplasms.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAppendiceal neoplasms are a group of rare, heterogeneous tumors that exhibit varying malignant potential. Systemic treatment options for disseminated appendiceal cancer are limited. We sought to review rates of mutations that may indicate potential roles for routine next-generation sequencing to identify targetable therapies.
methodsAn analysis of 916 appendiceal tumor samples submitted to American Association for Cancer Research Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) consortium was performed to compare patient demographics and the rates of mutations that may confer drug susceptibility.
resultsLow-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) had the lowest mutations per specimen (4.5 ± 4.6, p = 0.01) and the highest percentage of KRAS mutations (88.9%, p < 0.01). In KRAS-mutated LAMNs, 92% occurred at codon G12, with 56.5% at G12V and 39.1% at G12D. In total, 5.7%, 29.7%, 53.0%, and 71.8% of goblet cell, signet ring cell, appendiceal, and mucinous adenocarcinomas, respectively, had KRAS mutations. Across all appendiceal tumors, only a limited number had drug-targetable mutations within each gene evaluated: 7.0% KRAS G12C mutations, 26.4% GNAS mutations, 6.9% PIK3CA mutations, and 3.5% DNA mismatch repair gene (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) mutations. Collectively, 21.5% of appendiceal cancer cases were associated with at least one or more gene mutations with drug targeting potential, and 4.3% of cases had multiple targetable mutations.
conclusionsAlthough mutations suggesting available drug targeting occur at low frequencies in appendiceal tumors, minimal overlap of these mutations results in a sizeable subpopulation of patients that may benefit from targeted therapies. Next-generation sequencing may enable tailored therapeutic approaches for disseminated appendiceal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42809083What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.