Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42809165›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Analysis of the off-target interaction of amyloid PET tracers with human brain sulfotransferases.

Ludovico Miccoli, Rosa Fullone, Stefano Delli Pizzi, Federica Tomaiuolo, Stefano L Sensi, Giuseppe Floresta, Alberto Granzotto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Analysis of the off-target interaction of amyloid PET tracers with human brain sulfotransferases.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ludovico Miccoli *Center for Advanced Studies and Technology - CAST, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Rosa Fullone *Center for Advanced Studies and Technology - CAST, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Stefano Delli PizziDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging, and Clinical Sciences, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Federica TomaiuoloInstitute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies - ITAB, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Stefano L SensiCenter for Advanced Studies and Technology - CAST, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Giuseppe FlorestaDepartment of Drug and Health Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Alberto GranzottoCenter for Advanced Studies and Technology - CAST, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy. alberto.granzotto@unich.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9181-4373

Funding

Ministero della Salute D73C22002140007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPositron emission tomography (PET) tracers targeting amyloid-β (Aβ) are central to the diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, growing evidence indicates that these tracers can engage off-target molecules, complicating signal interpretation. Sulfotransferases (SULTs) have been experimentally identified as binding partners of 11C-Pittsburgh Compound-B (PiB), but whether the clinically used fluorinated PiB derivatives interact with brain-expressed SULTs has not been explored.

objectiveTo assess whether PiB and its fluorinated derivatives flutemetamol and flutafuranol interact with the SULT isoforms expressed in the human brain, and to characterize the structural features of these interactions.

methodsWe combined multi-omic transcriptomic profiling of the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project and the Human Protein Atlas with molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to evaluate the structural interactions of SULT-tracer complexes.

resultsSULT1A1, SULT1A3, and SULT4A1 were identified as the SULT isoforms predominantly expressed in the human brain, and all three are expressed in the cerebellum, the region used as a reference for Aβ PET signal normalization. Docking and MD simulations showed that all three tracers form energetically comparable complexes within the catalytic pockets of these isoforms, but their dynamic stability varied in an enzyme- and tracer-specific manner. PiB and flutemetamol were stably accommodated in SULT1A1, whereas PiB lost its initial pose in SULT4A1. Flutafuranol showed weaker binding to SULT1A1 but formed stable complexes in SULT1A3 and SULT4A1.

conclusionsThese findings provide a structural framework for off-target interactions between Aβ PET tracers and brain SULTs and suggest that the intracellular enzymatic environment may contribute to variability in Aβ PET signals beyond fibrillar Aβ deposition.

Indexed as

Amyloid beta-PeptidesAniline CompoundsBrainPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsSulfotransferasesAlzheimer DiseaseBenzothiazolesHumansMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationThiazoles2-(4'-(methylamino)phenyl)-6-hydroxybenzothiazoleAmyloid beta-PeptidesAniline CompoundsBenzothiazolesflutemetamolRadiopharmaceuticalsSulfotransferasesThiazolesAlzheimer's diseaseAmyloid-β (Aβ)CerebellumIn silico analysisMolecular dynamics (MD)Positron emission tomography (PET)Senile plaques

Identifiers

PMID42809165
PMCPMC13624043

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.