ArticlePloS one2026
Analysis of urinary kidney-specific cell-free DNA in preeclampsia.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess the feasibility of a novel methodology for quantifying kidney-specific cell-free DNA (ks-cfDNA) and explore whether levels differed between individuals with preeclampsia (PE) and normotensive pregnant controls (NP).
backgroundCell-free DNA (cfDNA) is released during cell death and circulates in bodily fluids, including urine. cfDNA quantities reflect the degree of organ injury. As PE is associated with hypertension and kidney injury, we hypothesised that urinary ks-cfDNA would be elevated in PE.
methodsIn this single-centre prospective case-control study urine samples were collected from 20 women with PE and 20 NP controls. Digital PCR was used to quantify three kidney-specific epigenetic targets (ks-et): ks-et1 (pan-kidney marker), ks-et2 (renal proximal tubular epithelial cell (RPTEC) and podocyte marker) and ks-et3 (RPTEC marker). The beta-actin gene (ACTB) represented total cfDNA (t-cfDNA).
resultsks-et2 and ks-et3 were higher in the PE group. Median ks-et2 was 231 copies/mL (IQR 65-383) versus 62 copies/mL (IQR 29-215) in NP controls (P = 0.028). Median ks-et3 was 81 copies/mL (IQR 28-199) in PE versus 20 copies/mL (IQR 9-81) for NP participants (P = 0.047). ks-et1 and t-cfDNA showed non-significant increases in PE. Fractional ks-et quantities normalised to t-cfDNA did not differ between groups. Urinary creatinine levels were higher in the PE group (10.9 mmol/L (IQR 4.1-15.3) versus 3.9 mmol/L (IQR 2.3-5.6), P = 0.005). Urine creatinine demonstrated the highest AUC (0.76, 95% CI 0.59-0.92).
conclusionThis exploratory study found that quantification of urinary ks-cfDNA was feasible and that absolute quantities of ks-cfDNA markers ks-et2 and ks-et3 were elevated in PE. Consistent with previous studies, urinary creatinine was a good predictor of PE and outperformed ks-cfDNA in discriminating between preeclamptic and normotensive pregnancies. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical utility and predictive ability of ks-cfDNA in PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.