ReviewPediatric research2026
Sildenafil in bronchopulmonary dysplasia-associated pulmonary hypertension: developmental and translational insights.
Review in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia-associated pulmonary hypertension (BPD-PH) is increasingly viewed as a developmental pulmonary vascular disorder rather than a purely reactive vasoconstrictive complication of chronic lung disease. It involves impaired angiogenesis, reduced pulmonary vascular surface area, alveolar simplification, and progressive right ventricle-pulmonary artery uncoupling. Sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, is widely used because it enhances nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate signaling and may reduce pulmonary vascular tone. However, neonatal-specific evidence remains limited, dosing approaches are heterogeneous, and its long-term effects on vascular remodeling and clinical outcomes are uncertain. This narrative review integrates developmental biology, translational evidence, clinical studies, pharmacokinetics, and safety considerations to critically evaluate sildenafil in BPD-PH. Current data support short-term improvements in echocardiographic hemodynamics and oxygenation in selected infants, but do not demonstrate durable remodeling reversal or improved survival. Experimental studies suggest effects on endothelial survival, smooth muscle proliferation, angiogenic signaling, and oxidative stress, although relevance to human preterm infants remains incompletely validated. Developmental pharmacokinetics, including CYP3A maturation, weight, postnatal age, route, and drug interactions, contribute to variable exposure. Sildenafil use should therefore be individualized, phenotype-guided, and evaluated in future trials with pharmacokinetic-guided dosing and longitudinal outcomes. IMPACT: Reframes bronchopulmonary dysplasia-associated pulmonary hypertension as a disorder of impaired pulmonary vascular development rather than a purely reactive vasoconstrictive process. Integrates developmental biology, translational evidence, and neonatal pharmacokinetics to critically evaluate sildenafil beyond its traditional vasodilatory role. Highlights the need for precision pharmacology approaches and pharmacokinetic-guided dosing to optimize therapeutic strategies in preterm infants.
Identifiers
42811096What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.