ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2026
Optimal timing of liver stiffness assessment in methotrexate-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients.
Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe cumulative methotrexate (MTX) dose threshold for initiating hepatic fibrosis screening in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains undefined. This study aimed to identify this threshold and compare the utility of transient elastography versus the Fibrosis‑4 (FIB-4) index as a screening tool.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of consecutive RA patients receiving MTX who had documented normal hepatic evaluation before treatment initiation. All participants underwent clinical assessment, laboratory testing (liver function tests, complete blood count, inflammatory markers), transient elastography (FibroScan; EchoSens, Paris, France), and FIB‑4 index calculation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cumulative MTX dose cutoff for predicting liver fibrosis (defined as a liver stiffness measurement ≥ 6 kPa). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of liver fibrosis.
resultsWe included 73 patients. The median liver stiffness was 4.1 kPa (IQR 3.45-4.95). Nine patients (12.3%) had evidence of liver fibrosis (≥ 6 kPa), of whom four (5.5%) had significant fibrosis (≥ 7.2 kPa). The median FIB‑4 index was 0.87 (IQR 0.61-1.20). Liver stiffness significantly correlated with age (r = 0.236, p = 0.045), cumulative MTX dose (r = 0.297, p = 0.003), MTX treatment duration (r = 0.279, p = 0.006), total bilirubin (r = 0.263, p = 0.025), and direct bilirubin (r = 0.622, p = 0.041). The FIB‑4 index correlated with age (r = 0.613, p 0.001), AST (r = 0.482, p 0.001), and bilirubin levels. A cutoff of 2990 mg cumulative MTX dose can discriminate between patients with normal liver function and those with liver fibrosis (sensitivity 100%, specificity 58%; AUC 0.793). This same cutoff can also discriminate between patients with a normal and those with an abnormal FIB‑4 index, albeit with lower sensitivity (69.5%) and specificity (58%) (AUC 0.587; p = 0.298).
conclusionA cumulative MTX dose of approximately 3 g represents a practical screening threshold for initiating liver fibrosis evaluation in RA patients. Transient elastography is superior to the FIB‑4 index for this purpose. Screening should be individualized based on metabolic risk factors, and elevated liver stiffness should prompt etiological investigation rather than automatic MTX discontinuation. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and assess long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42811154What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.